Rome vs San Francisco
Home Price & Cost of Living Comparison
Live DataLast updated: March 31, 2026·Source: OECD, Numbeo & National Statistics
💡 Why it matters: Rome vs San Francisco
Rome is 68% more affordable for homebuyers. Rome has a price-to-income ratio of 9.8x compared to 12.8x in San Francisco.
| Metric | Rome | San Francisco |
|---|---|---|
| Avg Home Price | $380,000 | $1,200,000 |
| Price / sqm | $5,500 | $14,000 |
| Rent (1BR) | $1,000/mo | $3,200/mo |
| Rent (3BR) | $1,800/mo | $5,000/mo |
| Price-to-Income | 9.8x | 12.8x |
| Mortgage Rate | 3.8% | 6.8% |
| 1yr Change | +1.5% | -1.5% |
| Median Income | $39,000/yr | $94,000/yr |
| Population | 2,800,000 | 870,000 |
📊
HomePricePeek Research TeamData Specialists
Our team analyzes data from OECD, Numbeo & National Statistics to deliver accurate, up-to-date information. All data is verified and cross-referenced with official sources.
✓ OECD, Numbeo & National Statistics✓ Updated 2025
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Rome or San Francisco more expensive?
Rome is more affordable. Home prices differ by $820,000 (68%).
Which city has cheaper rent, Rome or San Francisco?
Rent for a 1BR in Rome is $1,000/mo vs $3,200/mo in San Francisco.
Explore the DataPeek Network