Los Angeles vs Rome
Home Price & Cost of Living Comparison
Live DataLast updated: March 31, 2026·Source: OECD, Numbeo & National Statistics
💡 Why it matters: Los Angeles vs Rome
Rome is 55% more affordable for homebuyers. Los Angeles has a price-to-income ratio of 10.5x compared to 9.8x in Rome.
| Metric | Los Angeles | Rome |
|---|---|---|
| Avg Home Price | $850,000 | $380,000 |
| Price / sqm | $9,800 | $5,500 |
| Rent (1BR) | $2,800/mo | $1,000/mo |
| Rent (3BR) | $4,200/mo | $1,800/mo |
| Price-to-Income | 10.5x | 9.8x |
| Mortgage Rate | 6.8% | 3.8% |
| 1yr Change | +1.8% | +1.5% |
| Median Income | $81,000/yr | $39,000/yr |
| Population | 3,900,000 | 2,800,000 |
📊
HomePricePeek Research TeamData Specialists
Our team analyzes data from OECD, Numbeo & National Statistics to deliver accurate, up-to-date information. All data is verified and cross-referenced with official sources.
✓ OECD, Numbeo & National Statistics✓ Updated 2025
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Los Angeles or Rome more expensive?
Rome is more affordable. Home prices differ by $470,000 (55%).
Which city has cheaper rent, Los Angeles or Rome?
Rent for a 1BR in Los Angeles is $2,800/mo vs $1,000/mo in Rome.
Explore the DataPeek Network