Kingston vs San Francisco
Home Price & Cost of Living Comparison
Live DataLast updated: March 31, 2026·Source: OECD, Numbeo & National Statistics
💡 Why it matters: Kingston vs San Francisco
Kingston is 90% more affordable for homebuyers. Kingston has a price-to-income ratio of 7.5x compared to 12.8x in San Francisco.
| Metric | Kingston | San Francisco |
|---|---|---|
| Avg Home Price | $120,000 | $1,200,000 |
| Price / sqm | $1,500 | $14,000 |
| Rent (1BR) | $450/mo | $3,200/mo |
| Rent (3BR) | $800/mo | $5,000/mo |
| Price-to-Income | 7.5x | 12.8x |
| Mortgage Rate | 9.0% | 6.8% |
| 1yr Change | +4.8% | -1.5% |
| Median Income | $16,000/yr | $94,000/yr |
| Population | 670,000 | 870,000 |
📊
HomePricePeek Research TeamData Specialists
Our team analyzes data from OECD, Numbeo & National Statistics to deliver accurate, up-to-date information. All data is verified and cross-referenced with official sources.
✓ OECD, Numbeo & National Statistics✓ Updated 2025
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Kingston or San Francisco more expensive?
Kingston is more affordable. Home prices differ by $1,080,000 (90%).
Which city has cheaper rent, Kingston or San Francisco?
Rent for a 1BR in Kingston is $450/mo vs $3,200/mo in San Francisco.
Explore the DataPeek Network