Kingston vs Los Angeles
Home Price & Cost of Living Comparison
Live DataLast updated: March 31, 2026·Source: OECD, Numbeo & National Statistics
💡 Why it matters: Kingston vs Los Angeles
Kingston is 86% more affordable for homebuyers. Kingston has a price-to-income ratio of 7.5x compared to 10.5x in Los Angeles.
| Metric | Kingston | Los Angeles |
|---|---|---|
| Avg Home Price | $120,000 | $850,000 |
| Price / sqm | $1,500 | $9,800 |
| Rent (1BR) | $450/mo | $2,800/mo |
| Rent (3BR) | $800/mo | $4,200/mo |
| Price-to-Income | 7.5x | 10.5x |
| Mortgage Rate | 9.0% | 6.8% |
| 1yr Change | +4.8% | +1.8% |
| Median Income | $16,000/yr | $81,000/yr |
| Population | 670,000 | 3,900,000 |
📊
HomePricePeek Research TeamData Specialists
Our team analyzes data from OECD, Numbeo & National Statistics to deliver accurate, up-to-date information. All data is verified and cross-referenced with official sources.
✓ OECD, Numbeo & National Statistics✓ Updated 2025
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Kingston or Los Angeles more expensive?
Kingston is more affordable. Home prices differ by $730,000 (86%).
Which city has cheaper rent, Kingston or Los Angeles?
Rent for a 1BR in Kingston is $450/mo vs $2,800/mo in Los Angeles.
Explore the DataPeek Network