Christchurch vs Muscat
Home Price & Cost of Living Comparison
Live DataLast updated: March 31, 2026·Source: OECD, Numbeo & National Statistics
💡 Why it matters: Christchurch vs Muscat
Muscat is 38% more affordable for homebuyers. Christchurch has a price-to-income ratio of 7.8x compared to 5.5x in Muscat.
| Metric | Christchurch | Muscat |
|---|---|---|
| Avg Home Price | $450,000 | $280,000 |
| Price / sqm | $5,200 | $3,200 |
| Rent (1BR) | $1,400/mo | $900/mo |
| Rent (3BR) | $2,200/mo | $1,600/mo |
| Price-to-Income | 7.8x | 5.5x |
| Mortgage Rate | 6.8% | 5.5% |
| 1yr Change | +1.5% | +2.2% |
| Median Income | $58,000/yr | $51,000/yr |
| Population | 380,000 | 1,400,000 |
📊
HomePricePeek Research TeamData Specialists
Our team analyzes data from OECD, Numbeo & National Statistics to deliver accurate, up-to-date information. All data is verified and cross-referenced with official sources.
✓ OECD, Numbeo & National Statistics✓ Updated 2025
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Christchurch or Muscat more expensive?
Muscat is more affordable. Home prices differ by $170,000 (38%).
Which city has cheaper rent, Christchurch or Muscat?
Rent for a 1BR in Christchurch is $1,400/mo vs $900/mo in Muscat.
Explore the DataPeek Network